A COMPARATIVE STUDY : TRADITIONAL LEADERSHIP MODELS VS. NEUROGENETIC LEADERSHIP MODELS UNDER MENTAL HEALTH CARE ACT IN INDIA (NEUROGENETICS RESILIENCE ACT) COMPLIANCE

Abstract

The Neurogenetic relationship of humans and their capabilities in attaining the leadership positions are not only in direct relationship with their skills and educational background but also with their intangible assets that includes the DNA and brain genes likes The need for role of power dynamics  in determination of work break down structures from higher authority to lower authority  in the  organisations needs implementation of  neurocognitive psychological leadership models, when compared with traditional leadership models, from the literature we could determine the role of leader in the organisation, where only the traditional leadership approach has been adopted.But there has been no concentration provided in valuing the mental health capabilities of the employees or people in the organisations to enhance the workability of the organisations and there is a need to address those issues of legal and psychological setback where employees tangible assets has been only considered and the intangible assets that in inner psychological well-being and Heartfulness therapy organisations to address the stress, trauma and psychological imbalance in the A responsive leadership models could help in determining the work ethical breakdown Structures of both in tangible skills  that is skills, practical exposures, decision making skills, education qualifications, and intangible way which may include health,  brain functions, genetics ,peace ,inner capabilities and heredity etc.The role of both tangible and intangible qualities in the humans has direct and indirect relationship with the influence over power and authoritative capabilities between the employees from top management to bottom level management. In general  Power is defined to be the state of authority that has the direct and indirect influence over people's directions to attain goals.they are classified to be two types of power sensation

• where the dominance of power namely Power positivity procrastinating the other and
• power negativity. (Okpala,2021)