POSITION AND PROTECTION IN NEONATAL PHOTOTHERAPY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL EVALUATING HYPOCALCEMIA RISK
Keywords:
Phototherapy, Hypocalcemia, Neonate, Head covering, Prone position, Randomized controlled trial, Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal care, Serum calcium.Abstract
Background
Phototherapy-induced hypocalcemia is a well-recognized yet often under-monitored complication in neonates undergoing treatment for hyperbilirubinemia. This study assessed the role of head covering and body positioning in minimizing this risk while maintaining phototherapy efficacy.
Objectives
To evaluate the effect of head covering and prone positioning on the incidence of hypocalcemia in term neonates receiving phototherapy.
Trial Design
Prospective, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with a 1:1:1:1 allocation ratio.
Methods
A total of 180 term neonates with non-hemolytic hyperbilirubinemia were randomized into four groups: Supine without head covering, Supine with head covering, Prone without head covering, and Prone with head covering. All neonates underwent standardized LED phototherapy for 24 hours. Pre- and post-therapy serum calcium and bilirubin levels were measured, and clinical signs of hypocalcemia were monitored. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypocalcemia (serum calcium <8.0 mg/dL); secondary outcomes included change in serum calcium and bilirubin levels.
Results
Baseline characteristics were comparable across all groups. The incidence of hypocalcemia differed significantly (p = 0.001), with the lowest observed in the Prone + Head Covered group (13.3%) and the highest in the Supine + No Head Covering group (53.3%). Post-therapy serum calcium was highest in the Protected Prone group (8.5 mg/dL) and lowest in the Standard Supine group (8.0 mg/dL; p < 0.001). Bilirubin reduction was greatest in the Standard Prone group (6.5 mg/dL), with significant differences between groups (p = 0.023), but without compromising safety when head covering was used.
Conclusions
Head covering during phototherapy significantly reduces the risk of hypocalcemia in term neonates. When combined with prone positioning, the protective effect is enhanced while preserving phototherapy efficacy. This intervention is simple, cost-effective, and especially beneficial in resource-limited settings.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.