COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF WOUND CLOSURE TECHNIQUES IN ABDOMINAL SURGERIES: STAPLES VS. SUTURES

Abstract

Background: Abdominal surgeries require effective wound closure techniques to promote optimal healing and reduce postoperative complications. Staples and sutures are commonly used methods, each with distinct advantages and potential drawbacks. The choice between these techniques depends on factors such as ease of application, operative time, wound healing outcomes, patient comfort, and cosmetic results. Despite extensive use in clinical practice, there is ongoing debate and variability in outcomes associated with staples versus sutures.

Methods:The primary outcomes assessed included wound healing complications, such as dehiscence and infection, within 30 days post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included operative time for wound closure, patient comfort, and cosmetic satisfaction.

Results: Results indicated that both techniques effectively closed abdominal wounds, with no significant differences in wound healing complications observed between the staples and sutures groups (p>0.05). Operative time was shorter with staples compared to sutures (mean difference 15 minutes, p<0.05), while patient-reported comfort and cosmetic satisfaction were similar between the two groups.

Conclusion:In conclusion, both staples and sutures are effective options for wound closure in abdominal surgeries, with staples offering the advantage of shorter operative time. Patient comfort and cosmetic outcomes were comparable between the two techniques. The choice between staples and sutures should consider surgical preferences, cost-effectiveness, and specific patient factors.