PSYCHOLOGICAL JURISPRUDENCE: FOUNDATION TO CONFLICT RESOLUTION STRATEGY

Authors

  • SURYA. S
  • DR. ASHA SUNDARAM
  • DR. THANGAMAYAN

Keywords:

Psychology SEETHA framework, Law, Mental health, legal compliance, human value, Legal psychology, women psychology legal ethics , Emotions, conflict resolution strategy and framework, Human and gunas, arbitration

Abstract

Objective-Despite the general procedure adopted in order to resolve conflicts in organisations, it has been noticed that the international mediation to resolve conflicts takes time and been costly ,From the literature we could infer that the role of people involved in the process of procedures had not been considered as the main source of conflicts occurring scenario and resolving those conflicts through international arbitration is a tedious and long process that utilize more time and money, and yet will not be resolved for years hence in order to resolve those issues it has been detailed in this report to determine the various internal indicators which creates conflicts at organisational level, financial aspects and operational level at very early stage of conflict occurrence considering the legal aspects at each stage in organisations to resolve conflicts. A psychological tool need to be derived based on the internal indicators that have caused conflicts in the organisations and a detailed specified recommendations are required and need to be explained based upon the analysing the solution that need to be provided to resolve conflicts in organisations and to determine the role of psychology of women and men during the process of the conflict resolution methods.

Downloads

How to Cite

S, S., SUNDARAM, D. A., & THANGAMAYAN, D. (2025). PSYCHOLOGICAL JURISPRUDENCE: FOUNDATION TO CONFLICT RESOLUTION STRATEGY. TPM – Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 32(S8 (2025): Posted 05 November), 92–104. Retrieved from https://tpmap.org/submission/index.php/tpm/article/view/2501