COMPARISON OF INTRATHECAL NALBUPHINE IN DIFFERENT DOSES AS AN ADJUVANT TO HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE IN PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY

Authors

  • DR VIDYA SARANYA S MD ANAESTHESIOLOGY POSTGRADUATE
  • DR LATHA N HOD AND PROFESSOR ANAESTHESIOLOGY
  • DR BHARATHI B ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ANAESTHESIOLOGY

Keywords:

Intrathecal nalbuphine, bupivacaine, spinal anesthesia, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, postoperative analgesia, opioid adjuvants

Abstract

Background and Objectives- Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a well-established procedure for kidney stone removal, often performed under spinal anesthesia. Nalbuphine, a mixed κ-opioid receptor agonist and μ-opioid receptor antagonist, has demonstrated effective analgesic properties with minimal side effects. This study compares the effects of two different doses of intrathecal nalbuphine (0.5 mg vs. 1 mg) as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing PCNL.

Methods- A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 60 ASA I and II patients scheduled for elective PCNL under spinal anesthesia. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups (n=30 each): Group 1: 15 mg (3 mL) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine + 0.5 mg nalbuphine. Group 2: 15 mg (3 mL) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine + 1 mg nalbuphine. The primary outcome measured was the total duration of analgesia (time from injection to first rescue analgesia requirement). Secondary outcomes included two-segment regression time, motor block duration, hemodynamic changes, incidence of side effects, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at rest and during movement.

Results- Group 2 (1 mg nalbuphine) demonstrated a longer total analgesia duration (265.7 ± 30.8 min vs. 250.5 ± 32.1 min, p=0.08) and longer total motor block duration (172.8 ± 20.3 min vs. 160.4 ± 18.7 min, p=0.03) compared to Group 1. The two-segment regression time was comparable between groups (p=0.42). VAS scores at 4, 6, and 8 hours postoperatively were significantly lower in Group 2 (p<0.001), suggesting superior pain relief. The incidence of hypotension was slightly higher in Group 2 (8 vs. 3 patients, requiring vasopressors, p=NS), while nausea was reported in 7 patients in Group 2 compared to 2 in Group 1 (p=NS). No cases of pruritus, sedation, or respiratory depression were observed.

Conclusion- Intrathecal nalbuphine effectively enhances the analgesic properties of hyperbaric bupivacaine in PCNL patients. While both 0.5 mg and 1 mg doses provided prolonged analgesia, 1 mg resulted in a longer motor block and superior postoperative pain relief without significant side effects. Future studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to establish the optimal intrathecal nalbuphine dose for PCNL.

Downloads

How to Cite

SARANYA S, D. V., N, D. L., & B, D. B. (2025). COMPARISON OF INTRATHECAL NALBUPHINE IN DIFFERENT DOSES AS AN ADJUVANT TO HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE IN PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY. TPM – Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 32(S1 (2025): Posted 12 May), 596–602. Retrieved from https://tpmap.org/submission/index.php/tpm/article/view/226