EARLY VERSUS DELAYED ENTERAL NUTRITION AFTER GASTROINTESTINAL ANASTOMOSIS: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY
Abstract
Background: While early enteral feeding (EEF) within 24–48 hours post-gastrointestinal (GI) anastomosis is increasingly endorsed, concerns about safety persist.
Objective: To compare outcomes between early (≤ 48 h) and delayed (> 72 h) enteral nutrition in adult GI anastomosis patients.
Methods: Prospective observational study of 200 adult patients undergoing GI anastomoses. Patients were assigned to early or delayed feeding groups based on postoperative protocol. Primary outcomes: postoperative ileus duration, length of hospital stay (LOS), surgical site infection (SSI), anastomotic leak rate. Statistical analysis included chi-square and t-tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.
Results: (Hypothetical—consistent with literature) EEF group showed significantly shorter ileus (mean 4 vs. 6 days), reduced LOS (mean 7 vs. 12 days), lower SSI (10% vs. 25%), and no increase in leak rates.
Conclusion: Early enteral nutrition after GI anastomosis appears safe and beneficial, supporting enhanced recovery protocols, particularly when meticulous surgical technique is used.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.